Monday, November 24, 2008

fourth & clay holiday: feat. LINEA CARTA

sat & sun, dec 6 & 7, 11am - 6pm, fourth & clay studio (@ 4th street & channing way, berkeley)


it's time for the hustle and bustle of the holiday shopping again! go check out (and and certainly purchase) diva's lovely stationeries for your loved ones (or for yourself)!!! my personal plug aside, this event is truly a treat, so just come enjoy the holiday spirit and appreciate the creative energy of the artist community.

it also features other local artists as well, so come support your creative community and indulge in the retail-art therapy!

more information on the event: fourth & clay holiday

more information on diva and her work: linea carta

Thursday, November 20, 2008

synecdoche, my life....?

i am feeling rather blue and frazzled today, for i saw the new charlie kaufman film synecdoche, new york with amanda last night. the film itself was indeed poignantly done, and was built on extremely interesting plot and storyline (if there is one at all) that transcends the notion of time and place as kaufman always does. it would be a lie if i said i did not enjoy it. i did. actually, i was utterly enthralled. but at the same time, it was freighteningly honest and dark, frank, and so deep that it hurt my brain as well as my heart. i think that it got at the most sensitive and hideous parts of many of our fears - about life unfolding so fast, so meaninglessly, that death comes without a chance to be able to cultivate contentment with what one has achieved in a lifetime, and ultimately becomes this bitter, harboured sense of defeat and loss because one was unable to find "the answer" or "the truth."

i think what disturbs me the most about this film, is that it feels WAY too personal for me. i am scared of myself turning out like the protagonist. in essence, i think the film is supposed to let you know that life IS up to interpretation much like the film itself and the "theatrical performance" that the film is primarily focused around, that the film is but a perspective of the protagonist's life SOLELY through his interpretation. in other words, we as observers will never know which part of his story seen in the film is unbiased and real, and that some of it are sure to be warped and obscured via his hypochondria, OCD, depression, and mere emotional tide. i mean, i know this. my life IS up to me to decide whether it's fulfilling or not. i can be grateful or resentful. the cup can be half-full or half-empty. but this is exactly what i mean - we all struggle with this desolate sense of what i call "alone-ness," a helpless feeling beyond loneliness because yes, each one of us is alone in the process of interpreting his/her own life, and the film blatantly shows it.

the problem is that much like the protagonist, i too live too much in my head, my emotions sometimes take over my logical thoughts, and i do have neurosies that i can't quite explain. i also do harbour this sense of alone-ness, and sometimes, i am just sad. i am freightened of not being able to have done something meaningful in my life when it's time for me to die. i am scared of not finding the love of my life and thus never having my own "home." at least, though, i realize this. i realize that because i hold the power to interpret and understand my own life anyway i want, i must seize that power and recognize all the abundance that exist in my life. all the small joys and moments of glory. all the love i receive and hearts that i've touched.

so, for the love of the world, i surely hope NOT to go the way the protagonist went...! if you ever think i'm headed that way, DO let me know... PLEASE.

Thursday, November 06, 2008

PROTEST DOWN MARKET AGAINST H8!

PLEASE EVERYONE IN BAY AREA COME OUT AND SHOW SOLIDARITY!

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

one step forward, two steps back

it is a great honor and pleasure to have witnessed the victory of the first president of color. downtown oakland was just overjoyed lastnight, everyone celebrating on the streets with obama paraphernalia, star-spangled-banner, fire works, and music.



however, to my dismay, prop 8 passed... i've been following incessantly the progress of where this is going to go, and decided to speak up on kqed discussion forum, particularly in response to someone who were making fundamentally faulty argument for prop 8.

here is what he said:

Why does the news media insist on calling this a "Ban on Gay Marriage". It was never intended to be a "ban". Pete Wilson, not us, defined it that way to bias the voters. Prop 8 is about restoring traditional marriage as we have always known it. What actually happened when the California Supreme Court overturned Prop 22 is that marriages could no longer be between a husband and wife. It now was Party A and Party B. Our marriage institution had been destroyed. We could no longer be married as husband and wife, but only as Party A and Party B. I think the voters saw through Pete Wilson's trickery.

We, the YES voters of Prop A, have no grudges against gays and lesbians, except that they kept stealing our signs and accosting us, taking away OUR freedom of speech. If any rights are being trumped, it is ours, not theirs. We believe they should have all the same governmental rights as traditional marriage partners. However it is not "marriage". Marriage is between a man and a woman. Gays and lesbians should be provided government ceremonies that guaruntee equal rights, but it cannot be called "marriage". It is simply a civil union, call it whatever else you like.

Please stop refering to prop 8 as a "ban on gay marriage". It is, in fact, simply "restoration of traditional marriage".

- Ken Hatch


And to that, I responded:

I would like to respond to Mr. Hatch's idea of "restoring traditional marriage."

Let's think about this for a moment - what IS a "traditional marriage" in the context of present society (or even in the past)? A man and a woman "married" but each having acknowledged extra marital affairs considered "traditional marriage?" How about a man and a woman "married" on paper but for the sole purpose of getting around certain tax/financial/asset related regulations? How about an arranged or forced marriage between a man and a woman? What if that marriage is abusive and one was physically threatened into it? Are any of these sound like "traditional marriage" to you? They don't to me, but if you are defining "traditional marriage" on the basis of gender like you are doing (which I don't), these are all considered "traditional marriage." So if Prop 8 is truly about "restoring traditional marriage" NOT related to homophobia or bigotry against those who are in same-gender relationships, why didn't it address OTHER pertinent issues around this idea of "traditional marriage?"

Besides, if Prop 8 supporters are honestly not being hateful against people in same-sex relationships - or rather, who are sexually diverse different from the social norm - do you think they would be happy with a transgender man and transgender woman getting married? I highly doubt it.

In my opinion, defining "marriage," especially "traditional marriage" by gender is fundamentally faulty. It is merely an excuse to hide the underlying homophobia/transphobia and hatred towards those who are different.

No one CHOOSES to be born autistic, Asian, or overwight, black, white, woman, man, or hearing impaired, or any of these things. No one CHOOSES (at least to the most part) to become an alcoholic, homeless, or abused either. Sexual and gender identities/experiences are just the same. So why OUR civil rights challenged on the basis of something so natural as the colors of our skins?

Yes, I hated the fact that some "No Prop 8" activists vandalized and took more violent means to get their point across. But why should the rest of us who are good, honest, respectful, conscious, peaceful be repremanded - stripped off of civil rigths - for their wrong doings? Why then, shouldn't straight people's civil rights be stripped off for the death of Matthew Shepard or Brandon Teena and thousands of others who were KILLED based on hate crime? "Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" right? So please, spare me the beacause-you-did-this-you-deserve-it argument.

I had a dream, and now it is shattered. But I will continue to live a positive, honest, and peaceful life, and I will do what I can to change the ways of the world.

Yumi Aikawa


let us not go gentle into that good night. obama just changed history and overcame racial prejudice. we can do the same. we can change history and overcome homophobia.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

FIRE IT UP! READY TO GO!

i have been uneasy. anxious. all morning. then i saw this.



YES WE CAN. YES WE CAN.

LET'S CHANGE THE WORLD TODAY!!!

Monday, November 03, 2008

Self Blessing

Amazing podcast by a founder of SF Zen Center.

SELF BLESSING